Torah Portion Ki Tetze
Devarim – Deuteronomy 21:10-25:19
Deu 21:10 When you go forth to battle against your enemies, and YHWH your Elohim delivers them into your hands, and you carry them away captive,
Deu 21:11 and see among the captives a beautiful woman, and you have a desire to her, and would take her to you as wife;
Deu 21:12 then you shall bring her home to your house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;
Deu 21:13 and she shall put the clothing of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in your house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that you shall go in to her, and be her husband, and she shall be your wife.
This makes it clear that the ridiculous claim that it takes 2 or 3 years to “convert” to Judaism is simply false. She is his wife after only 30 days – no lengthy “conversion” required. Presumably, she agrees to learn and obey Torah or he wouldn’t marry her. Such a declaration appears to be the only requirement, however. She learns Torah as she goes through the Torah Cycle, just as other prosthelytes do. It is not a prerequisite to already know Torah and already be “converted” to marry a Jewish man.
This passage clearly supports the Sadducean method of conversion, which the Jerusalem Council adopted as the appropriate method. The person is considered part of the community at the start of their Torah learning, not at the end of it.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 21:14 It shall be, if you have no delight in her, then you shall let her go where she will; but you shall not sell her at all for money, you shall not deal with her as a slave, because you have humbled her.
Presumably, if she refuses to commit to Torah or has some other personality defect, the man simply releases her and that’s the end of it.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 21:15 If a man have two wives, the one beloved, and the other hated, and they have borne him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers who was hated;
Deu 21:16 then it shall be, in the day that he causes his sons to inherit that which he has, that he may not make the son of the beloved the firstborn before the son of the hated, who is the firstborn:
Deu 21:17 but he shall acknowledge the firstborn, the son of the hated, by giving him a double portion of all that he has; for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.
The Priesthood of the Firstborns is not negotiable or transferable. It is conferred upon a man’s firstborn son regardless of who gives birth to that son – in our case, this would mean that a man cannot disinherit a son from his first marriage in favor of a son from a subsequent marriage.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 21:18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, who will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and, though they chasten him, will not listen to them;
Deu 21:19 then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out to the elders of his city, and to the gate of his place;
Deu 21:20 and they shall tell the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.
Deu 21:21 All the men of his city shall stone him to death with stones: so shall you put away the evil from the midst of you; and all Yisra’el shall hear, and fear.
In this day and age, the rebellious son or daughter must simply be expelled from the home until they repent – tough love. A rebellious child cannot be allowed to bring sin and strife into the home, and to negatively influence other children or neighbors.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 21:22 If a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be put to death, and you hang him on a tree;
Deu 21:23 his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall surely bury him the same day; for he who is hanged is accursed of Elohim; that you don’t defile your land which YHWH your Elohim gives you for an inheritance.
This is the origin of the rule that a Jewish person must be buried within 24 hours of their death.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:1 You shall not see your brother’s ox or his sheep go astray, and hide yourself from them: you shall surely bring them again to your brother.
Deu 22:2 If your brother isn’t near to you, or if you don’t know him, then you shall bring it home to your house, and it shall be with you until your brother seek after it, and you shall restore it to him.
Deu 22:3 So shall you do with his donkey; and so shall you do with his garment; and so shall you do with every lost thing of your brother’s, which he has lost, and you have found: you may not hide yourself.
There’s no “finders, keepers” in Torah – a person must diligently make every effort to find the true owner of a lost item.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:4 You shall not see your brother’s donkey or his ox fallen down by the way, and hide yourself from them: you shall surely help him to lift them up again.
We do not allow animals (or children, or property) to be “punished” simply because we don’t like a person or have something against him or her.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:5 A woman shall not wear men’s clothing, neither shall a man put on women’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to YHWH your Elohim.
These are the only words that Torah has to say about clothing. There is no rule that everyone must go around dressed like “Little House on the Prarie” or “Fiddler on the Roof” or mimic any time period from ancient times to the middle ages in order to be dressed “correctly.” The styles of clothing that are normal, usual and customary for any culture are just fine as long as the women’s clothes are reasonably modest – and the definition of “modest” does not imply in any way that pants cannot be worn. “Immodest” clothing reveals too much skin and is too tight – it has nothing to do with the style of clothing.
Pants were in fact invented as women’s clothing about 800 BCE in the Far East and quickly migrated to the Near East. This is proven in countless artistic artifacts showing far and near eastern women wearing pants and long tunics as their ordinary clothing. Wealthy European men did not begin wearing pants until the mid 1700s – as any painting of Henry VIII and other historical figures will plainly show. They wore long tunics with hosen, not pants.
Meanwhile, women in both the near and far east had been wearing pants for nearly 2000 years. They were in use long before the era of Hellenisation, when Greek togas took over the “style” for women’s clothes. Then and in later days, Hebrew and other Near Eastern women who migrated to Europe were forced to abandon their native clothing and adopt Greek/Roman/Catholic styles. The Catholic governments preferred skirts for women – however, near eastern women had always worn caftans or tunics over pants previously, not skirts. So there is nothing whatsoever authentic or Biblical about skirts for women – they are an imposition of European culture and have nothing to do with original Hebraic custom and practice. If you want to dress like a real Hebrew woman, wear caftans (what we would consider to be ankle length tunics) or a shirt type tunic (knee-length) with pants – because that’s what near Eastern women wore then and still wear now.
Deuteronomy
Deu 22:6 If a bird’s nest chance to be before you in the way, in any tree or on the ground, with young ones or eggs, and the hen sitting on the young, or on the eggs, you shall not take the hen with the young:
Deu 22:7 you shall surely let the hen go, but the young you may take to yourself; that it may be well with you, and that you may prolong your days.
Obviously, by letting the mother bird fly away she can lay more eggs. This might be a considered an early environmentalist law, or perhaps an early law regarding food sustainability (similar to not killing fruit trees during a seige).
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:8 When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you don’t bring blood on your house, if any man fall from there.
An early safety regulation – and notice that negligence leading to someone’s death is unacceptable.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:9 You shall not sow your garden* with mixed** seed, lest the whole fruit be forfeited, the seed which you have sown, and the increase of the garden.
Often translated as “vinyard,” the more correct interpretation for the first part of this verse is simply “garden.” Grape vines aren’t sown by seeds, they’re propogated by cuttings and by root stocks. Therefore intention of this verse is to refer to a garden in general, not a vineyard.
H3754 כּרם kerem keh’-rem
From an unused root of uncertain meaning; a garden or vineyard: – vines, (increase of the) vineyard (-s), vintage.
This commandments didn’t make a lot of sense to either ancient or recent commentators, because companion planting and crop rotation are known to be the most effective and sustainable way to grow produce. However, it may not have truly been intended for ordinary farmers – this may be an example of a commandment that is intended specifically for our day and age.
H3610 כּלאים kil’ayim kil-ah’-yim
Dual of H3608 in the original sense of separation; two heterogeneities: – divers seeds (-e kinds), mingled (seed).
H3608 כּלא kele’ keh’-leh
From H3607; a prison: – prison. Compare H3610, H3628.
H3607 כּלא kâlâ’ kaw-law’
A primitive root; to restrict, by act (hold back or in) or word (prohibit): – finish, forbid, keep (back), refrain, restrain, retain, shut up, be stayed, withhold.
A seed with two separate hetergeneities imprisoned within it is a seed with DNA from some sorce other than it’s own parents – in other words, a genetically modified seed that did not “reproduce after its kind,” as Genesis informs us food must. Genetically modified seeds have DNA from other species, including unclean species such as pork and shellfish, inserted into them – and also contain “suicide genes” manufactured by seed companies to prevent the farmers from being able to collect their natural seeds every year to replant. The “suicide” genes prevent the seeds from germinated, so they cannot “reproduce after their kind.” Instead, the farmers have to continually buy seed from the manufacturer.
It appears that Elohim is not pleased with this type of “science.” Eating produce that doesn’t reproduce normally violates Elohim’s instructions for mankind:
Gen 1:29 Elohim said, “Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed. It will be your food.
And of course, genetically modified products that contain animal DNA, especially those of unclean creatures, are an unnatural abomination and should certainly not be considered kosher.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:10 You shall not plow with an ox and a donkey together.
This involves being “unequally yoked.”
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:11 You shall not wear a mixed stuff*, wool and linen together.
H8162 שׁעטנז sha‛aṭnêz shah-at-naze’
Probably of foreign derivation; linsey woolsey, that is, cloth of linen and wool carded and spun together: – garment of divers sorts, linen and woollen.
This appears to be related to the prohibition against genetically modified produce, above. A single garment should not have threads of both plant and animal origins. This is no doubt symbolic in some way of the proper separation of the natural orders, which genetically modified organisms are guilty of violating.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:12 You shall make you tzitziyot on the four borders of your garment, with which you cover yourself.
Tzitzits are mentioned elsewhere in scripture (Numbers 15:38). They require having a blue thread (or blue hem, depending on the translation used) and their purpose is to remind the wearer of Elohim’s commandments. Since its purpose is to be a personal reminder, there is no requirement that the tzitzits actually are visible to others – hence the development of the “tallit kattan,” an undershirt with tzitzits that a man in a secular profession can wear under his regular uniform or clothes.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:13 If any man take a wife, and go in to her, and hate her,
Deu 22:14 and lay shameful things to her charge, and bring up an evil name on her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came near to her, I didn’t find in her the tokens of virginity;
Deu 22:15 then shall the father of the young lady, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the young lady’s virginity to the elders of the city in the gate;
Deu 22:16 and the young lady’s father shall tell the elders, I gave my daughter to this man to wife, and he hates her;
Deu 22:17 and behold, he has laid shameful things [to her charge], saying, I didn’t find in your daughter the tokens of virginity; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter’s virginity. They shall spread the garment before the elders of the city.
Clearly this passage and the passages following cannot be applied to a divorcee or widow, because there would have been no expectation of her having been a virgin in the first place.
Concerning girls who were presented as virgins for marriage, it was apparently the custom in those days to have a white cloth spread out on the bed upon which a couple consummated their marriage – the white cloth then being immediately given to the girl’s parents. That was the original purpose of the man and woman going off in private for an hour or so during the wedding feast and then returning to party. Today the “short period of seclusion” still occurs in traditional weddings but the marriage is no longer consumated at that time. Since in these times the consummation does not take place until later at night after all guests and parents have dispersed, the cloth is no longer used, either (since the witnesses all having left, it would no longer prove the girl was a virgin at the wedding).
Therefore it is not really possible to prove a young woman was a virgin at the time of her wedding unless she receives an examination from a physician immediately prior to the ceremony, which most people are not willing to do. It is therefore unclear how this passage can be adapted to modern times.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:18 The elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him;
Deu 22:19 and they shall fine him one hundred [shekels] of silver, and give them to the father of the young lady, because he has brought up an evil name on a virgin of Yisra’el: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.
This was obviously intended to protect the girl from becoming an indigent outcast, but in this day and age other social safety nets are available. Such an argument will no doubt degenerate into a “he said/she said” dispute and be unprovable. It is better if such hatred exists to grant a divorce, since there is no proof either way.
As discussed below:
Deu 24:1 When a man takes a wife, and marries her, then it shall be, if she find no favor in his eyes, because he has found some uncleanness in her, that he shall write her a bill of divorce, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. Deu 24:2 When she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s [wife].
H6172 ערוה ‛ervâh er-vaw’
From H6168; nudity, literally (especially the pudenda) or figuratively (disgrace, blemish): – nakedness, shame, unclean (-ness).
H6168 ערה ‛ârâh aw-raw’
A primitive root; to be (causatively make) bare; hence to empty, pour out, demolish: – leave destitute, discover, empty, make naked, pour (out), rase, spread self, uncover.
If a girl presented herself as a virgin but is suspected of not being one, then the suspicion of her uncleanness due to “ prior activities” is acceptable grounds for a divorce.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:20 But if this thing be true, that the tokens of virginity were not found in the young lady;
Deu 22:21 then they shall bring out the young lady to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done folly in Yisra’el, to play the prostitute in her father’s house: so shall you put away the evil from the midst of you.
Obviously if the man was prepared to forgive his wife for her youthful indescretions, none of this would ever have come up in public. As before, in the absence of proof, we cannot declare her guilty – therefore a divorce is the honorable solution (and, of course, even if it could be proved true “the law of the land is the law” and we cannot impose capital punishment for religious infractions).
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, the man who lay with the woman, and the woman: so shall you put away the evil from Yisra’el.
Adultery is a capital offense to Elohim, but of course this cannot be carried out in modern times. If the wronged spouse is inclined to forgive – let restitution be made instead. If the wronged spouse is not inclined to forgive, then let them divorce – this would be considered an “uncleanness” and is therefore a valid reason for a divorce.
Deu 22:23 If there be a young lady who is a virgin pledged to be married to a husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her;
Deu 22:24 then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones; the lady, because she didn’t cry, being in the city; and the man, because he has humbled his neighbor’s wife: so you shall put away the evil from the midst of you.
The premise here is that in the city, building were crowded together and women and elderly people and young children were at home all day – she should have made a racket of some kind to draw attention to the situation. Clearly this would not apply to today’s sprawling suburbs of single family homes and both spouses working all day.
The intent of the passage is to show that the woman had some responsibility in a reasonably crowded place to not be in a situation where a man could take advantage of her, and if she found herself in such a situation, she is obligated to make every effort to avoid being ravaged. This would seem to imply that purposefully putting oneself in such a situation implies guilt and sin. Therefore, wearing immodest clothing is an avoidable enticement and women are, in fact, culpable if their clothes are shamefully immodest.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:25 But if the man find the lady who is pledged to be married in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her; then the man only who lay with her shall die:
Deu 22:26 but to the lady you shall do nothing; there is in the lady no sin worthy of death: for as when a man rises against his neighbor, and kills him, even so is this matter;
Deu 22:27 for he found her in the field, the pledged to be married lady cried, and there was none to save her.
The presumption, again, is that she was too isolated for anyone to realize she was in trouble.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:28 If a man find a lady who is a virgin, who is not pledged to be married, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
Deu 22:29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the lady’s father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has humbled her; he may not put her away all his days.
This was, again, intended to prevent the girl from being outcast and indigent and to insure if she became pregnant the child would have financial support. As before, we have other social safety nets these days.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 22:30 A man shall not take his father’s wife, and shall not uncover his father’s skirt.
Whether or not she is his mother.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:1 He who is wounded in the stones, or has his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the assembly of YHWH.
A man who is disfigured in his genitals may not enter service at the Temple. He is blemished and therefore unfit. This does not prevent him from worshipping or studying Torah or even teaching – but he cannot enter the Temple (or Tabernacle) itself.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:2 A mamzer shall not enter into the assembly of YHWH; even to the tenth generation shall none of his enter into the assembly of YHWH.
Though often translated as “bastard,” that is not the meaning of the word. A mamzer is the product of an illegal union, such as that of an adulterous affair, or a marriage between person who are not permitted to marry, such as first cousins or other close relatives.
Abraham was born only a couple of hundred years after the flood, at a time when this law was not yet being enforced due to inadequate population – and obviously during Adam’s lifetime such prohibitions were not enforced. But by the time of Moses, mankind had sufficient population regenerated to implement these types of prohibitions strictly. Since is had not been put into full force previously, this law was given a stiff penalty to deter those who still intended to follow the old technically improper (but necessary at the time) ways.
This passage also teaches us that there are some extenuating circumstances that set aside full implementation of Torah laws. Disregarding laws concerning marriage of siblings and close cousins immediately after creation and after the flood are obvious examples. Substituting divorce for stoning, as above, would be another such instance.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:3 An `Ammonite or a Mo’avite shall not enter into the assembly of YHWH; even to the tenth generation shall none belonging to them enter into the assembly of YHWH forever:
Deu 23:4 because they didn’t meet you with bread and with water in the way, when you came forth out of Egypt, and because they hired against you Bil`am the son of Be’or from Petor of Aram-Naharayim, to curse you.
Deu 23:5 Nevertheless YHWH your Elohim wouldn’t listen to Bil`am; but YHWH your Elohim turned the curse into a blessing to you, because YHWH your Elohim loved you.
Obviously the “ten generations” had passed by the time of Ruth and Boaz, because she was admitted into the assembly and became the grandmother of King David. Therefore this law is “expired.”
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:6 You shall not seek their shalom nor their prosperity all your days forever.
This is a slightly different commandment – giving aid and comfort to enemies is never a good policy, and Ammon and Moav (modern day Jordan) continue to be antagonists to the State of Israel even to this day.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:7 You shall not abhor an Edomite; for he is your brother: you shall not abhor an Egyptian, because you lived as a foreigner in his land.
Deu 23:8 The children of the third generation who are born to them shall enter into the assembly of YHWH.
Again, the three generations have long passed. This law is also apparently “expired.”
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:9 When you go forth in camp against your enemies, then you shall keep you from every evil thing.
The concept of “honorable” warfare is Biblical – a war is not an excuse for unacceptable or illegal behavior or activities.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:10 If there be among you any man, who is not clean by reason of that which happens him by night, then shall he go abroad out of the camp, he shall not come within the camp:
Deu 23:11 but it shall be, when evening comes on, he shall bathe himself in water; and when the sun is down, he shall come within the camp.
In the same way a person who has marital relations is required to be unclean and to bathe prior to participating in religious observances.
Lev 15:16 “‘If any man has an emission of semen, then he shall bathe all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the evening. Lev 15:17 Every garment, and every skin, whereon the semen is, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the evening. Lev 15:18 If a man lies with a woman and there is an emission of semen, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the evening.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:12 You shall have a place also outside of the camp, where you shall go forth abroad:
Deu 23:13 and you shall have a paddle among your weapons; and it shall be, when you sit down abroad, you shall dig therewith, and shall turn back and cover that which comes from you:
Deu 23:14 for YHWH your Elohim walks in the midst of your camp, to deliver you, and to give up your enemies before you; therefore shall your camp be holy, that he may not see an unclean thing in you, and turn away from you.
Natural bodily functions such as marital relations and elimination are not sinful, but they are a reminder of our mortal existence, which is far less holy and perfect that the eternal immortal bodies we will receive at the Parousia or Resurrection.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:15 You shall not deliver to his master a servant who is escaped from his master to you:
Deu 23:16 he shall dwell with you, in the midst of you, in the place which he shall choose within one of your gates, where it pleases him best: you shall not oppress him.
This is very clear and concise – an escaped slave is to be given sanctuary, not turned over to the authorities.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:17 There shall be no prostitute of the daughters of Yisra’el, neither shall there be a sodomite [male prostitute] of the sons of Yisra’el.
These professions are not acceptable in any way.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:18 You shall not bring the hire of a prostitute, or the wages of a dog, into the house of YHWH your Elohim for any vow: for even both these are an abomination to YHWH your Elohim.
The money earned from unclean professions is itself considered unclean, and not fit for offerings, tithes or vows. There are numerous businesses today for which this prohibition would apply – striptese joints, places that show or rent pornography, drug dens, brothels, etc.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:19 You shall not lend on interest to your brother; interest of money, interest of food, interest of anything that is lent on interest:
Deu 23:20 to a foreigner you may lend on interest; but to your brother you shall not lend on interest, that YHWH your Elohim may bless you in all that you put your hand to, in the land where you go in to possess it.
Your “brother” is any Jew or Christian – these claim to be part of the House of Israel and they are therefore our “bretheren.” A business or profession that charges interest to a fellow Jew or fellow Christian is in violation of this law. Interest earnings obtained from fellow Jews or Christians is unclean money and not acceptable as offerings, tithes or vows.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:21 When you shall vow a vow to YHWH your Elohim, you shall not be slack to pay it: for YHWH your Elohim will surely require it of you; and it would be sin in you.
Deu 23:22 But if you shall forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in you.
Deu 23:23 That which is gone out of your lips you shall observe and do; according as you have vowed to YHWH your Elohim, a freewill offering, which you have promised with your mouth.
If you make a religious vow of any kind, including a financial one, you are bound by it – however, you are not required to make any vows (even if your congregations wants you to).
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 23:24 When you come into your neighbor’s vineyard, then you may eat of grapes your fill at your own pleasure; but you shall not put any in your vessel.
Deu 23:25 When you come into your neighbor’s standing grain, then you may pluck the ears with your hand; but you shall not move a sickle to your neighbor’s standing grain.
You may grap with your hands a fruit or vegetable that you intend to eat immediately, because you are hungry and need it. Elohim here presumes that your neighbor is a good person and would gladly give you a bite to eat if you asked. But that does not mean you can presume to share in your neighbor’s harvest without consent.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:1 When a man takes a wife, and marries her, then it shall be, if she find no favor in his eyes, because he has found some unseemly thing in her, that he shall write her a bill of divorce, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
Deu 24:2 When she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s [wife].
Often translated as “uncleanness” or “nakedness” (see above), something “unseemly” would be something contrary to Elohim’s law, such as promiscuity, or idolatry, or Torahlessness. These are valid reasons for a divorce. However, “falling out of love,” or “irreconcilable differences” are NOT valid reasons for divorce.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:3 If the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorce, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, who took her to be his wife;
Deu 24:4 her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before YHWH: and you shall not cause the land to sin, which YHWH your Elohim gives you for an inheritance.
It is this law which constrains how Elohim acts toward his betrothed, the House of Israel. Israel has been married to other gods – therefore in order to avoid violating his own Torah, Elohim had two choices. One, destroy Israel entirely and find a new betrothed, or two, die himself to erase the old bond, dissolve it completely, and allow a new marriage bond to be created.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:5 When a man takes a new wife, he shall not go out in the army, neither shall he be charged with any business: he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer his wife whom he has taken.
Our current army is, of course, blatantly in violation of this law.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:6 No man shall take the mill or the upper millstone to pledge; for he takes [a man's] life to pledge.
The general idea is that it is not ethical to take as collateral something which they need to repay the loan you made to them.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:7 If a man be found stealing any of his brothers of the children of Yisra’el, and he deal with him as a slave, or sell him; then that thief shall die: so shall you put away the evil from the midst of you.
Kidnapping is a capital offense to Elohim.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:8 Take heed in the plague of leprosy, that you observe diligently, and do according to all that the Kohanim the Levites shall teach you: as I commanded them, so you shall observe to do.
Deu 24:9 Remember what YHWH your Elohim did to Miryam, by the way as you came forth out of Egypt.
This refers generally to the instructions of Leviticus chapters 13 and 14 concerning various diseases and molds/mildews on property. During any plague, rules of quarantine and the burning of infected materials MUST be observed to safeguard the health of the community. It is not being “compassionate” to ignore these rules, it is suicide.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:10 When you do lend your neighbor any manner of loan, you shall not go into his house to get his pledge.
Deu 24:11 You shall stand outside, and the man to whom you do lend shall bring forth the pledge outside to you.
Deu 24:12 If he be a poor man, you shall not sleep with his pledge;
Deu 24:13 you shall surely restore to him the pledge when the sun goes down, that he may sleep in his garment, and bless you: and it shall be righteousness to you before YHWH your Elohim.
It is demeaning to search through someone else’s home or take their belongings that they need to live or earn a living. You must treat your clients with dignity and ethical standards at all times.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:14 You shall not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether he be of your brothers, or of your foreigners who are in your land within your gates:
Deu 24:15 in his day you shall give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down on it; for he is poor, and sets his heart on it: lest he cry against you to YHWH, and it be sin to you.
It has become an unfortunate but common practice in many Rabbinic communities to withhold the pay of teachers or charitable workers because of budgeting problems. This passage commands that paying wages should be the FIRST priority of a business, not the last.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
You may recall some passages speak of Elohim’s disfavor lasting to the “third and fourth generations.” This is not, however, an indication of direct punishment. It is more correct to say that Elohim will not magically remove the bad circumstances that your sin creates for your children and grandchildren. If you are a drunk, for example, your children and grandchildren will suffer due to your negligence, irresponsibility and violence. The fault would be 100% yours, however – not Elohim’s. If you gamble away your money, your family will be homeless – again, your fault. If you get involved in any sinful activity and get caught, you are sowing the seeds of bad consequences for your children and grandchildren. Things would have been very different for their lives if you had not lived a life of sin.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:17 You shall not wrest the justice [due] to the foreigner, [or] to the fatherless, nor take the widow’s clothing to pledge;
Deu 24:18 but you shall remember that you were a bondservant in Egypt, and YHWH your Elohim redeemed you there: therefore I command you to do this thing.
A just and fair system of courts is a must for any good society. All cases should be decided on the merits of the fact presented, and not on factors of popularity, wealthy, class, race, etc.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 24:19 When you reap your harvest in your field, and have forgot a sheaf in the field, you shall not go again to get it: it shall be for the foreigner, for the fatherless, and for the widow; that YHWH your Elohim may bless you in all the work of your hands.
Deu 24:20 When you beat your olive tree, you shall not go over the boughs again: it shall be for the foreigner, for the fatherless, and for the widow.
Deu 24:21 When you gather [the grapes of] your vineyard, you shall not glean it after you: it shall be for the foreigner, for the fatherless, and for the widow.
Deu 24:22 You shall remember that you were a bondservant in the land of Egypt: therefore I command you to do this thing.
The idea here is to provide the poor with an honorable way of earning their food – by coming to your field and working to harvest the portion you leave for them. This gives them dignity and a sense of control in their lives, and it is much better for them than just receiving a handout.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:1 If there be a controversy between men, and they come to judgment, and [the judges] judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked;
Deu 25:2 and it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his wickedness, by number.
Deu 25:3 Forty stripes he may give him, he shall not exceed; lest, if he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then your brother should seem vile to you.
The Sages ruled that only 39 stripes could be administered, in case somebody lost count.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:4 You shall not muzzle the ox when he treads out [the grain].
Like the man who grabs a fruit or veggie from your field (above), Elohim presumes a good person would not withhold food from a hungry animal.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:5 If brothers dwell together, and one of them die, and have no son, the wife of the dead shall not be married outside to a stranger: her husband’s brother shall go in to her, and take her to him as wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her.
Deu 25:6 It shall be, that the firstborn whom she bears shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead, that his name not be blotted out of Yisra’el.
Deu 25:7 If the man doesn’t want to take his brother’s wife, then his brother’s wife shall go up to the gate to the elders, and say, My husband’s brother refuses to raise up to his brother a name in Yisra’el; he will not perform the duty of a husband’s brother to me.
Deu 25:8 Then the elders of his city shall call him, and speak to him: and if he stand, and say, I don’t want to take her;
Deu 25:9 then his brother’s wife shall come to him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face; and she shall answer and say, So shall it be done to the man who does not build up his brother’s house.
Deu 25:10 His name shall be called in Yisra’el, The house of him who has his shoe untied.
Inheritance and lineage are very imporant concepts in Hebraic thought. A man needs heirs for his property and/or business. If a man were to die childless, that property would pass to distant relatives or be sold to strangers, and be lost to the family. We know this is not Elohim’s will, since other laws such as the Jubilee (Yovel) require land to be returned to the original family who owned it. In the Messianic Age, people will receive an inheritance by lot in the Holy Land and it will be passed down from generation to generation, not sold off to strangers. Elohim intended the economy to be built on irrevocable property ownership – something today’s bankers and mortgage companies don’t seem to understand.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:11 When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draws near to deliver her husband out of the hand of him who strikes him, and puts forth her hand, and takes him by the secrets;
Deu 25:12 then you shall cut off her hand, your eye shall have no pity.
Maiming or injuring a man’s genitals renders him unfit for Temple service – effectively cutting him off from Elohim’s presence.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:13 You shall not have in your bag diverse weights, a great and a small.
Deu 25:14 You shall not have in your house diverse measures, a great and a small.
Deu 25:15 A perfect and just weight shall you have; a perfect and just measure shall you have: that your days may be long in the land which YHWH your Elohim gives you.
Deu 25:16 For all who do such things, [even] all who do unrighteously, are an abomination to YHWH your Elohim.
Cheating your customers or business partners in any way is unacceptable to Elohim, no matter how good the “cause” supposedly is.
Deuteronomy, continued:
Deu 25:17 Remember what `Amalek did to you by the way as you came forth out of Egypt;
Deu 25:18 how he met you by the way, and struck the hindmost of you, all who were feeble behind you, when you were faint and weary; and he didn’t fear Elohim.
Deu 25:19 Therefore it shall be, when YHWH your Elohim has given you rest from all your enemies round about, in the land which YHWH your Elohim gives you for an inheritance to possess it, that you shall blot out the memory of `Amalek from under the sky; you shall not forget.
Obviously it is impossible to “forget” something written in Torah, so we are not commanded to “forget Amalek,” we are commanded NOT to forget to “blot out the memory” of Amalek. To blot out the memory is to leave a man with no descendants, as we see above in the passage concerning Levitical marriages. The commandment of this passage is to put the household of Amalek “under the ban,” leaving no survivors – to “blot” his house out of the Book of Life.
Next: Haftarah Ki Tetze.